If They Get Free Health Care, Then I Want a Colt.

I was listening to Rush today, and I heard him make a great point that I wish I had thought of myself. Then again, it is hard to compete with a man of his caliber.

He was speaking of the Health Care bill that is being shoved into our faces. Now, I do not believe that this "Obama Care" is in any stretch of the imagination a good piece of legislation, but there is one aspect of universal health care that I haven't thought of before.

Government is not established to ensure that we have all that we need. Government is established to ensure that no one stops us from pursuing what we need. In other words, the government protects (or should protect) our rights from being infringed upon. So looking at this through the proverbial glasses of the health care field, and more specifically health insurance, the government is supposed to ensure that others do not infringe upon our rights to seek health care, if we want it.

Now, under Obama's plan, we will be required (and subject to a $2500 fine per year if we fail) to have some type of health insurance. Putting aside the argument that under this system all privately owned insurance companies will eventually see their own demise due to the inevitability that private companies will cease to offer health insurance to their employees when they can simply sign up for Obama Care, this type of system holds one other very frightening aspect.

You see, when people must sign up for a single payer system of health care, the government can decide who gets treatment, and who doesn't. We already see this happening in Europe and Canada. The elderly, especially, are often considered to be a lost cause by the bureacracy and are denied health care due simply to the fact that they are not worth the money.

Now, stay with me, beause this IS going somewhere.

We have a right to bear arms. If we choose, we can go out and by a pistol or a rifle or a shotgun. As a matter of fact, yesterday, I bought another pistol to add to my collection. That's right, I have a small collection of guns, and by God, I love them. But back to my point. Even though we have a right to buy firearms, that does not mean that the government is responsible for providing us with a means of self-defense, i.e. a firearm. But we do have the right to bear arms.

In the true definition of a "right," we do have a right to health care. If we so choose, we can purchase health insurance. If we do not choose to purchase health care, we still have the right to get care and just pay out of pocket.

But when we enter into a system that decides who gets what kind of health care, when they get it, and who they get it from, and they have the ability to deny pace-makers, cancer treatment, and organ transplants to those that they deem a "lost cause," we, in essence, lose our right to get health care. So those politicians who claim that health care is a right, are absolutely right. But they are the very ones who are pushing to take that right away.

We don't have a right to have health care provided for us for free, but we do have a right to health care in exactly the same way that we have a right to own guns. If these politicians believe that our "right" to health care means that it should be provided for us, why don't they push for the government to provide all of us AK47s. If this is about ensuring that our rights are not infringed, and providing those things that we have rights to is how they plan to protect our rights, then they would view the right to bear arms the same way.

Ah. But that's just it. Universal health care isn't about ensuring that our rights are not infringed upon. It's about power. The more facets of our life that they can get their hands into--health care, the automobile industry, energy--the more ways they can strong arm us into complying with their own agendas. This is exactly what they are trying to do.

And you can see this on both sides of the aisle. I used to consider myself a Republican. But too many Republicans are becoming Big-Government Republicans, and they too, are now trying to step into our lives and advance their own agendas, though not as blatantly and on as grand a scale as the Democrats. This is why I consider myself a Conservative now, and only a Conservative. But that's a post for a different time.

See, the difference between the gun analogy and health care isn't that guns can be dangerous and health care keeps people alive. No, that shouldn't matter. Under their premise, if both are rights, then both should be provided by the government. The difference is that guns in the hands of the people that they oppress scare them. That takes power away from them. Getting their grubby nasty hands into our health care system, however, gives them the ultimate power over us. They decide who lives and who dies.

I guess if they do shove this bull into our faces, I'll just start writing my congressmen and ask that they add to my gun collection on the taxpayer's dime. Because if this kind of health care is Constitutional, so is a government paid 1911 .45 cal. Colt.

Get Your Priorities in Line, Mr. President

I read an article on the Drudge Report tonight that caught my attention fairly quickly. The headline read, "Jesus missing from Obama's Georgetown Speech." This article was posted on the NBC Washington news website. The article reports that a monogram displaying Jesus' name behind a podium at Georgetown university was requested to be covered by the Whitehouse before President Obama gave an economic speech this week.

As I read through the article, I began to think to myself, "Have we really digressed this much in America? Is this the very sight of Christ, the word Jesus so offensive that we can't speak his name at a publicly sponsored function or even have a picture of his name displayed in the background of a presidential speech at a Christian university?" This is utter lunacy. The vast majority of the American population personally claims to be born-again Christians, yet our president is too scared to have Christ's name in view at a speech.

I am a religious man, a young religious man--only 23 years old, and I have religious tolerance instilled into my very conscience because I understand why our nation was founded. Most, not all, but most of the original settlers that colonized this very soil that we walk on everyday came to this place to escape religious persecution. So I have no problem with any man or woman worshipping in the manner that he or she sees as the best way to do so, nor do I have a problem with anyone chosing not to worship. That is your perrogative as an American. But to be ashamed of your belief, to go to such lengths as to hide the Man on whose principles we based our laws and social morals is to begin a path toward societal decay.

I can already predict the arguments from the leftists. "Well our Constitution clearly states that Congress shall pass no law establishing an official religion, so we aren't a Christian nation, and we shouldn't have any mention of God or symbols of religion in government affairs."

I agree. Congress can't pass any legislation to establish a religion in the United States. But who said anything about that? This is a sign with Jesus' name on it. Nobody is asking president Obama to get in front of a crowd and say that the Christian religion is the official religion of the United States and if you don't like it, then go somewhere else. He was speaking at a Christian college for cryin' out loud. What did you expect, oh Great Leader Obama? Would you rather it be your name up there behind you on display at a Christian college? Or maybe you want fine Obamian universities to spring up across this great nation. Maybe that's what this is about. Maybe our wonderful and great leader is jealous that Jesus has a higher approval rating than he does. Apparently he feels subservient to Saudi King Abdullah and bows (I thought he was about to kneel to the ground and kiss his hand), but he can't share the spotlight with Jesus. This is definitely the man I want leading the free world and protecting us from radical Islam.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Obama is a Muslim. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt when he says he is a Christian. But, by God, don't go to another country and bow to a leader like that, in a gesture insinuating that you are inferior to him, then hide the name of Jesus in a religious learning intsitution. Get your priorities in line, Mr. President.